International Journal of Energy Engineering          
International Journal of Energy Engineering(IJEE)
Frequency: Yearly
Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Sri Bandyopadhyay(Australia)
Rice Husk as a Substitute Fuel in Cement Kiln Plant
Full Paper(PDF, 377KB)
A simple mathematical model of heat balance was applied to a cement kiln plant with a precalciner to estimate the effect of using rice husk as a substitute fuel for natural gas on specific heat consumption. Effects of the husk ash on the characteristics of the raw mix and clinker of ordinary Portland cement were also evaluated. Referring to Egyptian kiln plants data, it was found that the weight of rice husk required to supply fuel heat in the precalciner represented about 11-13% of the raw mix weight and about 90% of the total fuel weight (natural gas + husk). Specific heat consumption increased by about 3.7%, and the amount of combustion flue gases increased by about 20% when natural gas was completely substituted by rice husk. The use of rice husk as a substitute fuel in a cement kiln plant was accompanied by a marked decrease of lime saturation factor of the raw mix, a drastic decrease of tricalcium silicate and an increase of dicalcium silicate in the clinker. This data can provide the basis for the formation of a new type of cement such as high belite cement. The raw mix design was adjusted using pyrite as a correcting factor to keep the characteristics of the raw mix and the clinker similar to the factory data.
Keywords:Alternative Fuel; Rice Husk; Natural Gas; Raw Mix Design; Clinker Mineral Composition; Raw Mix Parameters; Specific Heat Consumption
Author: L. M. Farag1, H. K. Abd El-Hamid1
1.Ceramics Dept., National Research Centre Dokki, Cairo, Egypt
  1. Rosemann H., Locher F.W., and Jeschar R., “Fuel energy consumption and operational behavior of rotary cement kiln plants with precalcining,” Cement- Lime- Gypsym, vol. 10, pp. 489-498, 1987.
  2. Hendricks C. A., et al., “Emission reduction 0f green house gases from the cement industry,” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Green Gas Control Technologies ,Interfaken, Austria, Aug 30-Sep 2., IEA GHG R & D Programme, UK, 1998.
  3. Koglbauer G., “Maximizing alternative fuel utilization in the cement pyro-process,” 7th Arab International Conference And Exhibition on Environment Protection in Cement& Building Materials Industries, Beirout, Lebanon, pp. 10-12, 2009.
  4. Schurmann H., “Alternative fuels in the cement manufacturing process,” Cement – Lime- Gypsum, vol. 6, pp. 56-63, 2014.
  5. Matthias M., “Burning alternative fuels in cement kilns,” Cement-Lime-Gypsum, vol. 6, pp. 44-49, 2014.
  6. Farag L. M., Ghorab H., and El Nemr A., “Evaluation of the Operational Behaviour of an Egyptian Cement Dry Process Kiln Plant,” Journal of Applied Sciences Research, vol. 9, pp. 4245-4254, 2013.
  7. Ritzmann H., “Cyclic phenomena in the rotary kiln systems,” Cement- Lime-Gypsum International, vol. 8, pp. 383-343, 1971.
  8. Goldmann W., Kreft W., and Schutte R., “Cyclic phenomena of sulfur in cement kilns,” World Cement Technology, vol. 11, pp. 424-430, 1981.
  9. Farag L. M., “Thermal evaluation of cement dry process with complete kiln gas removal through by pass,” cement–Lime-Gypsum International, vol. 43, iss. 11, pp. 542-549, 1990.
  10. Barakati P., Bordoloi D., and Borthakur P., “Paddy husk as raw material and fuel for making Portland cement,” Cement and concrete research, vol. 24, pp. 613-620, 1994.
  11. Hamad M.A., El-Abd H. A., and Farag L. M., “Pyrolysis-Combustion Process of High Ash Agricultural Residues,” Reprinted from Waste Treatment &Utilization, Theory and Practice of Waste Management, vol. 2, Pergamon Presss- Oxford and New York, 1982.
  12. Biomass Combined Heat and Power Catalog of Technologies.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Combined Heat and Power Part vership CHP September, 2007.
  13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ( IPCC), Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventors, vol. 5, Waste, 2006.
  14. Murray A. and Price L., “Use of alternative fuels in cement manufacture: Analysis of fuel characteristics and feasibility for use in the Chinese Cement Sector,” Ernest Orlando Lawrence Barkely National Laboratory, 10 March, 2011, http: //ies,
  15. Seboka Y., Getahun M.A., Haile Y., and Meskel Y., “Biomass energy for cement production: Opportunities In Ethiopian CDM Capacity Development in Eastern and southern Africa,” United Nations Development Programme, 2009.
  16. Nielson P. B. and hundebol S., “Precalcining with low volatile solid fuels,” Zement-KalkGips, no. 4, pp. 99-100, 1986.
  17. Hochdahl O., “Fuels and heat economy,” Zement Kalk Gips, no. 4, pp. 90-96, 1986.
  18. Roy G. R., “Petcoke combustion characteristics,” World Cement, 2002.
  19. IEA Clean Coal Centre, “Reducing carbon in ash,” Nigel Dong ccc/167, ISBN 978-92-9029-487-0, pp. 64, May 2010.
  20. Vaccaro M., et al., “Burning alternative fuels in rotary cement kilns- Effect of unburned carbon,” Construction and building materials, vol. 19, pp. 509-515, 2005.
  21. Keefe B. P. and Shenk R.E., “The best total value for pyro technology,” pp. 81-89, ISSN: 1079-9931/ 07/2007.
  22. Taghian G., “Investigations On Cement Dry Process With Respect To Fuel Economy And Product Quality,” Ph.D thesis, Cairo Ubiversity, 1997.
  23. Heiligensteadt H.W., “Warmetechnische Rechnungen fur Industrieofen Verlag Stahleisn M.B.H/ Dusseldorf,” pp. 21-25, 1966.
  24. Duda W. H., Cement–Data –Book, vol. 1, International Process Engineering in the Cement Industry; Berlin: Bauverlag, 1985.